0.09/0.11	% Problem    : Vampire---4.8_24681 : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.09/0.12	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.11/0.32	% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
0.11/0.32	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.11/0.32	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.11/0.32	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.11/0.32	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.11/0.32	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.11/0.32	% WCLimit    : 180
0.11/0.32	% DateTime   : Mon Jul  3 13:04:30 EDT 2023
0.11/0.32	% CPUTime    : 
0.16/0.45	Running higher-order theorem provingRunning: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.cwToahjKd7/Vampire---4.8_24681
0.16/0.45	# Version: 3.1pre001-ho
0.16/0.48	# Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSLLLCHSA.
0.16/0.48	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.16/0.48	# Starting lpo1_fix with 540s (3) cores
0.16/0.48	# Starting full_lambda_9 with 180s (1) cores
0.16/0.48	# Starting almost_fo_4 with 180s (1) cores
0.16/0.48	# Starting new_ho_9 with 180s (1) cores
0.16/0.48	# Starting pre_casc_4 with 180s (1) cores
0.16/0.48	# Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 180s (1) cores
0.16/0.48	# pre_casc_4 with pid 24863 completed with status 0
0.16/0.48	# Result found by pre_casc_4
0.16/0.48	# Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSLLLCHSA.
0.16/0.48	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.16/0.48	# Starting lpo1_fix with 540s (3) cores
0.16/0.48	# Starting full_lambda_9 with 180s (1) cores
0.16/0.48	# Starting almost_fo_4 with 180s (1) cores
0.16/0.48	# Starting new_ho_9 with 180s (1) cores
0.16/0.48	# Starting pre_casc_4 with 180s (1) cores
0.16/0.48	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.5,0,3,20000,1.0,true)
0.16/0.48	# Search class: HGUSM-FFMM31-DHSMMSBN
0.16/0.48	# partial match(3): HGHSM-FFMM31-SHSSMSBN
0.16/0.48	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.16/0.48	# Starting new_ho_10 with 98s (1) cores
0.16/0.48	# new_ho_10 with pid 24865 completed with status 0
0.16/0.48	# Result found by new_ho_10
0.16/0.48	# Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSLLLCHSA.
0.16/0.48	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.16/0.48	# Starting lpo1_fix with 540s (3) cores
0.16/0.48	# Starting full_lambda_9 with 180s (1) cores
0.16/0.48	# Starting almost_fo_4 with 180s (1) cores
0.16/0.48	# Starting new_ho_9 with 180s (1) cores
0.16/0.48	# Starting pre_casc_4 with 180s (1) cores
0.16/0.48	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.5,0,3,20000,1.0,true)
0.16/0.48	# Search class: HGUSM-FFMM31-DHSMMSBN
0.16/0.48	# partial match(3): HGHSM-FFMM31-SHSSMSBN
0.16/0.48	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.16/0.48	# Starting new_ho_10 with 98s (1) cores
0.16/0.48	# Preprocessing time       : 0.005 s
0.16/0.48	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.16/0.48	
0.16/0.48	# Proof found!
0.16/0.48	# SZS status Theorem
0.16/0.48	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.16/0.48	thf(decl_22, type, is_of: $i > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.16/0.48	thf(decl_23, type, all_of: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.16/0.48	thf(decl_25, type, in: $i > $i > $o).
0.16/0.48	thf(decl_47, type, ordsucc: $i > $i).
0.16/0.48	thf(decl_77, type, e_is: $i > $i > $i > $o).
0.16/0.48	thf(decl_123, type, nat: $i).
0.16/0.48	thf(decl_124, type, n_is: $i > $i > $o).
0.16/0.48	thf(decl_142, type, n_pl: $i > $i > $i).
0.16/0.48	thf(decl_143, type, esk1_0: $i).
0.16/0.48	thf(decl_144, type, esk2_0: $i).
0.16/0.48	thf(def_all_of, axiom, ((all_of)=(^[X3:$i > $o, X2:$i > $o]:(![X4:$i]:(((is_of @ X4 @ X3)=>(X2 @ X4)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.cwToahjKd7/Vampire---4.8_24681', def_all_of)).
0.16/0.48	thf(def_is_of, axiom, ((is_of)=(^[X1:$i, X2:$i > $o]:((X2 @ X1)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.cwToahjKd7/Vampire---4.8_24681', def_is_of)).
0.16/0.48	thf(def_e_is, axiom, ((e_is)=(^[X1:$i, X60:$i, X61:$i]:(((X60)=(X61))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.cwToahjKd7/Vampire---4.8_24681', def_e_is)).
0.16/0.48	thf(def_n_is, axiom, ((n_is)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(Z1))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.cwToahjKd7/Vampire---4.8_24681', def_n_is)).
0.16/0.48	thf(satz4f, conjecture, (all_of @ (^[X1:$i]:((in @ X1 @ nat))) @ (^[X1:$i]:((all_of @ (^[X184:$i]:((in @ X184 @ nat))) @ (^[X185:$i]:((n_is @ (ordsucc @ (n_pl @ X1 @ X185)) @ (n_pl @ X1 @ (ordsucc @ X185))))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.cwToahjKd7/Vampire---4.8_24681', satz4f)).
0.16/0.48	thf(satz4b, axiom, (all_of @ (^[X1:$i]:((in @ X1 @ nat))) @ (^[X1:$i]:((all_of @ (^[X179:$i]:((in @ X179 @ nat))) @ (^[X180:$i]:((n_is @ (n_pl @ X1 @ (ordsucc @ X180)) @ (ordsucc @ (n_pl @ X1 @ X180))))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.cwToahjKd7/Vampire---4.8_24681', satz4b)).
0.16/0.48	thf(c_0_6, plain, ((all_of)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o]:(![X4:$i]:((((Z0 @ X4))=>(Z1 @ X4)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_all_of])).
0.16/0.48	thf(c_0_7, plain, ((is_of)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i > $o]:((Z1 @ Z0)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_is_of])).
0.16/0.48	thf(c_0_8, plain, ((e_is)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i, Z2:$i]:(((Z1)=(Z2))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_e_is])).
0.16/0.48	thf(c_0_9, plain, ((all_of)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o]:(![X4:$i]:((((Z0 @ X4))=>(Z1 @ X4)))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_7])).
0.16/0.48	thf(c_0_10, axiom, ((n_is)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(Z1))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_n_is, c_0_8])).
0.16/0.48	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ~(![X280:$i]:(((in @ X280 @ nat)=>![X279:$i]:(((in @ X279 @ nat)=>((ordsucc @ (n_pl @ X280 @ X279))=(n_pl @ X280 @ (ordsucc @ X279)))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz4f])]), c_0_9]), c_0_10])).
0.16/0.48	thf(c_0_12, plain, ![X284:$i]:(((in @ X284 @ nat)=>![X283:$i]:(((in @ X283 @ nat)=>((n_pl @ X284 @ (ordsucc @ X283))=(ordsucc @ (n_pl @ X284 @ X283))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[satz4b]), c_0_9]), c_0_10])).
0.16/0.48	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ((in @ esk1_0 @ nat)&((in @ esk2_0 @ nat)&((ordsucc @ (n_pl @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0))!=(n_pl @ esk1_0 @ (ordsucc @ esk2_0))))), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])])])).
0.16/0.48	thf(c_0_14, plain, ![X346:$i, X347:$i]:((~(in @ X346 @ nat)|(~(in @ X347 @ nat)|((n_pl @ X346 @ (ordsucc @ X347))=(ordsucc @ (n_pl @ X346 @ X347)))))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])])])).
0.16/0.48	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ((ordsucc @ (n_pl @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0))!=(n_pl @ esk1_0 @ (ordsucc @ esk2_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])).
0.16/0.48	thf(c_0_16, plain, ![X1:$i, X4:$i]:((((n_pl @ X1 @ (ordsucc @ X4))=(ordsucc @ (n_pl @ X1 @ X4)))|~((in @ X1 @ nat))|~((in @ X4 @ nat)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])).
0.16/0.48	thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, (in @ esk2_0 @ nat), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])).
0.16/0.48	thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, (in @ esk1_0 @ nat), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])).
0.16/0.48	thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16]), c_0_17]), c_0_18])]), ['proof']).
0.16/0.48	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.16/0.48	# Parsed axioms                        : 312
0.16/0.48	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 244
0.16/0.48	# Initial clauses                      : 108
0.16/0.48	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
0.16/0.48	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 105
0.16/0.48	# Processed clauses                    : 139
0.16/0.48	# ...of these trivial                  : 4
0.16/0.48	# ...subsumed                          : 6
0.16/0.48	# ...remaining for further processing  : 129
0.16/0.48	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
0.16/0.48	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.16/0.48	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.16/0.48	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.16/0.48	# Generated clauses                    : 16
0.16/0.48	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 10
0.16/0.48	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.16/0.48	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.16/0.48	# Paramodulations                      : 12
0.16/0.48	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.16/0.48	# NegExts                              : 0
0.16/0.48	# Equation resolutions                 : 3
0.16/0.48	# Total rewrite steps                  : 17
0.16/0.48	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.16/0.48	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.16/0.48	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.16/0.48	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.16/0.48	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.16/0.48	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.16/0.48	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.16/0.48	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.16/0.48	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.16/0.48	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.16/0.48	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.16/0.48	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.16/0.48	# Current number of processed clauses  : 32
0.16/0.48	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 15
0.16/0.48	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.16/0.48	#    Negative unit clauses             : 5
0.16/0.48	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 12
0.16/0.48	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 72
0.16/0.48	# ...number of literals in the above   : 230
0.16/0.48	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.16/0.48	# Current number of archived clauses   : 96
0.16/0.48	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 636
0.16/0.48	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 240
0.16/0.48	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 6
0.16/0.48	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13
0.16/0.48	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.16/0.48	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
0.16/0.48	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.16/0.48	# Condensation attempts                : 139
0.16/0.48	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.16/0.48	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 13814
0.16/0.48	
0.16/0.48	# -------------------------------------------------
0.16/0.48	# User time                : 0.018 s
0.16/0.48	# System time              : 0.004 s
0.16/0.48	# Total time               : 0.022 s
0.16/0.48	# Maximum resident set size: 2976 pages
0.16/0.48	
0.16/0.48	# -------------------------------------------------
0.16/0.48	# User time                : 0.026 s
0.16/0.48	# System time              : 0.005 s
0.16/0.48	# Total time               : 0.031 s
0.16/0.48	# Maximum resident set size: 2136 pages
0.16/0.48	% E---3.1 exiting
0.16/0.48	EOF